In the aftermath of Kirk’s death, millions are mourning. But some people are cold-blooded.
And now a major liberal lost their job for these disgusting comments about Charlie Kirk.
DC Comics Cancels Red Hood Series After Writer’s Vile Comments on Charlie Kirk’s Assassination
Charlie Kirk, the 31-year-old founder of Turning Point USA and a leading voice for conservative values, was tragically assassinated during a speaking event at Utah Valley University in Orem, Utah. Shot in the neck during a Q&A session, Kirk succumbed to his injuries shortly after being rushed to a hospital, leaving behind his wife, Erika, and a legacy of advocating for free speech, limited government, and American exceptionalism.
President Donald Trump announced Kirk would posthumously receive the Presidential Medal of Freedom, calling him a “giant” and “champion” whose work inspired millions, particularly young Americans. The assassination, labeled a “political assassination” by Utah Governor Spencer Cox, has intensified concerns about escalating political violence in the U.S.
Hours after Kirk’s death, DC Comics writer Gretchen Felker-Martin posted inflammatory comments on Bluesky, mocking the tragedy with remarks like, “Thoughts and prayers you Nazi b-tch” and “Hope the bullet’s okay after touching Charlie Kirk.”
These callous statements, made as the nation mourned a vibrant conservative leader, sparked widespread outrage. DC Comics swiftly canceled Felker-Martin’s Red Hood series after its first issue, released the same day, informing retailers on September 10 that orders for issues #2 and #3 were voided and credits would be issued for all copies of #1, even those sold. DC’s statement to Popverse emphasized that “posts or public comments that can be viewed as promoting hostility or violence are inconsistent with DC’s standards of conduct,” a clear response to Felker-Martin’s hateful rhetoric.
Outrage Over Felker-Martin’s Remarks and DC’s Response
Felker-Martin’s posts, which were deleted after her Bluesky account was suspended, were not isolated. Screenshots revealed additional inflammatory comments, including one dismissing police officers as “not people,” further highlighting her pattern of dehumanizing rhetoric.
The backlash was immediate, with figures like Ethan Van Sciver condemning DC’s association with writers who “cackle and bathe in Charlie Kirk’s blood.”
Conservative voices, including Art Thibert, called for accountability, arguing that Felker-Martin’s remarks disrespected Kirk and those grieving his loss. Bluesky itself issued a warning against glorifying violence, noting that such content violates its guidelines, as Felker-Martin’s posts were part of a wave of users celebrating Kirk’s m*rder.
DC’s decision to cancel Red Hood, a mature-rated series featuring Jason Todd in the fictional city of New Angelique, was seen as a necessary stand against endorsing creators who glorify political violence.
Kirk, known for his principled stance on issues like free speech and traditional values, was a polarizing yet influential figure who galvanized young conservatives.
Felker-Martin’s mockery of his death, coupled with her history of controversial statements—such as defending the October 7, 2023, Hamas attack and denying the civilian status of Israelis—drew scrutiny to DC’s initial decision to hire her. Critics argued that her comments not only dishonored Kirk’s memory but also alienated fans who admired his courage in confronting divisive issues.
Kirk’s Legacy
Charlie Kirk’s assassination is a stark reminder of the dangers faced by public figures who champion conservative ideals in a polarized climate.
His work with Turning Point USA empowered a generation to engage in political discourse, and his death has been mourned by leaders across the spectrum, from Trump to European officials who called it a “dark day for American democracy.”
Felker-Martin’s remarks, by contrast, reflect a troubling trend of dehumanizing opponents, a tactic Kirk consistently opposed in his advocacy for open debate. The cancellation of Red Hood points to DC’s recognition that associating with such rhetoric risks tarnishing its brand and alienating readers who value civility.
While some defenders of Felker-Martin, like writer John Lees, argued her comments were a reaction to Kirk’s anti-trans views, the consensus among Kirk’s supporters is that celebrating his m*rder crosses a moral line.
Kirk’s final moments, debating issues of public safety, exemplified his commitment to engaging tough questions, even under threat. DC’s swift action, though not explicitly naming Felker-Martin, sends a message that glorifying violence against figures like Kirk, who dedicated his life to principled activism, is unacceptable. As the investigation into his k*lling continues, with no suspect yet charged, Kirk’s legacy as a fearless advocate endures, while Felker-Martin’s career faces significant consequences for her reckless words.
