Joe Biden and the Democrats thought they had covered everything up. They made a huge mistake.
That’s why Trump’s intel chief had to share this stunning revelation on Fox News.
Whistleblowers Expose Alleged Obama Administration Efforts to Undermine Trump
On Sunday, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard announced that whistleblowers have begun stepping forward following the release of documents and a memo that outline actions taken by the Obama administration to target President Donald Trump after his 2016 election victory.
Gabbard made public a series of documents and a memo on Friday, describing what she termed a “years-long coup” aimed at Trump following his defeat of former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton in the 2016 presidential election. She characterized the whistleblowers as individuals “disgusted” by what she called a “treasonous conspiracy” initiated under former President Barack Obama after Clinton’s loss.
“We have whistleblowers coming forward now, after we released these documents because there are people who were around, who were working within the intelligence community who so disgusted by what happened, we’re starting to see some of them come out of the woodwork here because they, too, like you and I and the American people, want to see justice delivered,” Gabbard told Sunday Morning Futures host Maria Bartiromo. “So we’re going to provide everything that we have, everything that we will continue to gather to the Department of Justice for that direct intent and that direct purpose.”
“There must be indictments. Those responsible, no matter how powerful they are or were at that time, no matter who was involved in creating this treasonous conspiracy against the American people, they all must be held accountable,” Gabbard continued.
In 2020, Special Counsel John Durham obtained a guilty plea from Kevin Clinesmith, who faced charges related to Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act applications targeting Carter Page, part of the FBI’s monitoring of individuals connected to Trump’s 2016 campaign. Clinesmith was sentenced to probation and 400 hours of community service in January 2021.
Gabbard raised concerns about why Durham, tasked with investigating the FBI’s surveillance of the Trump campaign, did not uncover the materials she recently released or “put together the dots.”
“This is of such historic consequence that it cannot be limited to one or two or three different people. You just outlined the implications and the effects of what actually occurred and I think you’re really putting into a clear picture what we are referring to when we refer to the deep state,” Gabbard told Bartiromo. “It is very far-reaching. These are people who are intent on undermining the will of the American people and trying to ultimately, put themselves above our democracy and this is why it’s so important that we continue down this path, we continue to stay very focused.”
“I question the same things that you’re asking here. I don’t know how it is – yes, I put my team on this, we’ve been working on this over the last few months. I’ve been in this role as director of National Intelligence for just about six months,” Gabbard continued. “I don’t know what excuse there is for those who supposedly investigated this previously, whether it was Durham or others, that they were not able to put together the dots and ultimately show the truth to the American people.”
On May 15, 2023, Durham issued a report on the FBI’s investigation into alleged ties between Trump’s 2016 campaign and Russia, concluding that the FBI “did not and could not corroborate” claims from the Steele Dossier, which was used to secure warrants for monitoring communications of Page and other Trump associates.
During an October 2022 trial, FBI analyst Brian Auten testified that the FBI offered Christopher Steele $1 million to substantiate the dossier’s claims, but Steele was unable to do so.
Democrats’ Alleged Use of Federal Government to Target Political Opponents
The allegations raised by Tulsi Gabbard point to a pattern of claims that Democrats have leveraged federal agencies to undermine political opponents, particularly President Donald Trump. These claims center on actions taken during and after the 2016 election, with critics arguing that elements within the FBI, Department of Justice, and intelligence community were weaponized to target Trump and his associates.
The Steele Dossier, a controversial document compiled by former British intelligence officer Christopher Steele, has been a focal point of these allegations. The dossier, funded in part by the Democratic National Committee and the Clinton campaign through the law firm Perkins Coie, contained unverified allegations of ties between Trump’s campaign and Russia. It was used by the FBI to justify surveillance warrants under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) against Carter Page, a Trump campaign advisor. The Durham report, released in 2023, criticized the FBI’s handling of the dossier, noting its lack of corroboration and raising questions about the agency’s impartiality.
Kevin Clinesmith’s guilty plea in 2020 further fueled claims of misconduct. As an FBI attorney, Clinesmith admitted to altering an email used in the FISA application process to downplay Page’s prior cooperation with the CIA, potentially misleading the FISA court. Critics argue this incident exemplifies how federal employees manipulated legal processes to target Trump’s campaign, undermining democratic principles.
The FBI’s Crossfire Hurricane investigation, launched in 2016 to probe alleged Russian interference in the election, has also drawn scrutiny. The Durham report highlighted procedural flaws, including the FBI’s reliance on unverified information and its failure to rigorously vet sources like Steele. Critics contend that the investigation was driven by political motivations within the Obama administration to discredit Trump’s candidacy and presidency.
Beyond the FBI, allegations extend to the Department of Justice and intelligence agencies. The declassification of documents in 2020 by then-Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe revealed notes suggesting that Hillary Clinton approved a plan to link Trump to Russian hacking efforts as a means of distracting from her email controversy. These notes, attributed to then-CIA Director John Brennan, have been cited as evidence of a coordinated effort to use intelligence resources against Trump.
The use of FISA courts has been a particular point of contention. Reports indicate that the Obama administration expanded FISA surveillance in its final years, with some critics alleging that this was done to monitor political opponents. The 2018 Nunes memo, authored by then-House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes, claimed that the FBI and DOJ abused FISA processes to target Trump’s campaign, relying heavily on the Steele Dossier while omitting its political origins.
More recently, whistleblowers have alleged that federal agencies continued to target Trump during his presidency. For instance, IRS whistleblowers in 2023 claimed that the Justice Department slow-walked investigations into President Joe Biden’s son, Hunter Biden, while aggressively pursuing cases against Trump allies. This has been cited as evidence of selective enforcement by federal agencies under Democratic influence.
