Donald Trump is not above some revenge. He believes what goes around comes around.
And that’s why President Trump slapped Kamala harris with an unprecedented decision to change her life.
Trump Strips Kamala Harris of Secret Service Protection
President Donald Trump has once again shown he’s not here to play by the establishment’s rules, revoking Secret Service protection for former Vice President Kamala Harris, a senior White House official confirmed with reporters. This decisive action, effective September 1, marks another chapter in Trump’s ongoing battle to dismantle the remnants of the Biden administration’s influence and hold his political rivals accountable.
Under federal law, former vice presidents are entitled to Secret Service protection for six months after leaving office, a period that ended for Harris on July 21. However, former President Joe Biden quietly signed a directive extending Harris’ protection for an additional year, a move kept under wraps until Trump’s latest action exposed it.
The memorandum, titled “Memorandum for the Secretary of Homeland Security,” leaves no room for ambiguity: “You are hereby authorized to discontinue any security-related procedures previously authorized by Executive Memorandum, beyond those required by law, for the following individual, effective September 1, 2025: Former Vice President Kamala D. Harris.”
This move comes as Harris prepares to embark on a nationwide book tour to promote her memoir, 107 Days, which chronicles her short-lived and failed 2024 presidential campaign. The timing of Trump’s decision is no coincidence—it’s a clear message to Harris and the Democratic elite that special privileges won’t be extended to those who’ve opposed him.
Kirsten Allen, a senior adviser for Harris, told CNN that the former vice president is “grateful” to the Secret Service for their “professionalism, dedication, and unwavering commitment to safety.” Yet, gratitude won’t shield Harris from the reality of Trump’s no-nonsense approach.
The bad blood between Trump and Harris runs deep, rooted in years of political clashes and personal animosities. During her tenure as vice president, Harris repeatedly positioned herself as a vocal critic of Trump, accusing him of undermining American values and pushing divisive policies. Her role in the Biden administration, which Trump has consistently labeled as a disaster for the economy, border security, and national pride, made her a prime target for his ire. Harris’ high-profile campaign against Trump in 2024, where she leaned heavily on identity politics and progressive talking points, only deepened the rift.
Trump’s supporters see this latest move as a justified response to what they view as Harris’ complicity in the Biden administration’s failures. From skyrocketing inflation to the chaotic border crisis, many Americans blame Harris for her role in pushing policies that they believe weakened the nation. Not to mention the fact that it was the Biden administration that raided Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago residence.
Her tenure as “border czar” was particularly contentious, with critics arguing she failed to address the surge of illegal immigration, a key issue for Trump’s base. The revocation of her Secret Service protection is seen by many as Trump delivering on his promise to hold the establishment accountable, no matter how powerful the player.
The decision has sparked outrage among Democratic leaders, who are quick to frame it as an act of vengeance. California Governor Gavin Newsom, briefed on the situation late Thursday, had his spokesperson Bob Salladay decry the move, stating that no public official should be “subject to erratic, vindictive political impulses.” Similarly, Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass called the termination an “act of revenge,” vowing to work with Newsom to ensure Harris’ safety through local police protection. These criticisms, however, ring hollow to Trump supporters who see them as hypocritical whining from a party that spent years targeting Trump with investigations and legal battles.
Trump’s history with the Biden administration is a saga of mutual distrust and retaliation. After the 2020 election, Biden barred Trump from receiving intelligence briefings, citing his “erratic behavior” following the January 6 Capitol riot—a move Trump has not forgotten.
In retaliation, Trump revoked Biden’s security clearances and intelligence briefings in February, along with those of other prominent Democrats like Hillary Clinton and members of Biden’s family. This tit-for-tat dynamic highlights the deep-seated animosity between Trump and the Biden-Harris camp, with each side accusing the other of abusing power.
In January, he ended Secret Service protection for his former national security adviser John Bolton, a vocal critic, and in March, he stripped protection from Biden’s adult children, Hunter and Ashley. These actions resonate with Trump’s base, who view them as a rejection of the elite’s sense of entitlement. For many, Harris’ extended protection—quietly granted by Biden—was just another example of the swamp protecting its own.
The revocation of Harris’ security detail carries significant implications, especially given her high-profile status and the threats she faced as the first female and first Black vice president. Former Secret Service officials have noted that Harris’ unique position made her a target for heightened security risks, a concern that intensified during her 2024 campaign. With her federal protection gone, Harris may need to rely on costly private security or local law enforcement, a burden that could cost millions annually. This reality only amplifies the perception among Trump supporters that Harris is reaping the consequences of her political choices.
Critics of Trump argue that this move endangers Harris, particularly as she gears up for her book tour. The memoir, 107 Days, is expected to stir controversy, delving into her campaign’s struggles and the Democratic Party’s challenges. Without Secret Service protection, Harris aides worry about the loss of real-time threat intelligence, which monitored everything from social media to in-person events. Yet, Trump’s base sees this as a non-issue, arguing that Harris, like any private citizen, should bear the cost of her own security if she chooses to remain in the public eye.
The revocation of Harris’ protection is a reminder of Trump’s willingness to take controversial actions to assert his vision for America—one that prioritizes loyalty to the country over loyalty to the political class. For many, it’s a refreshing rejection of the status quo.
California’s Democratic leaders are scrambling to fill the gap left by the federal withdrawal. Newsom and Bass have signaled their intent to provide Harris with local police protection. Bass’ statement to CNN, framing Trump’s decision as part of a “long list of political retaliation,” is likely to fuel further outrage among Democrats, who see this as an attack on Harris’ safety and legacy.
