Harris ally laughed off TV after making the dumbest claim about Trump
The Harris campaign is a joke so far. They’re doing nothing right.
And a Harris ally was just laughed off of TV after making this truly moronic claim about Donald Trump.
Since making her bid for President official in late July, Kamala Harris and her campaign allies have been pretty quiet in terms of saying anything that isn’t just back-burner regurgitated talking points. The campaign so far has been characterized by a bunch of clowns raving about how Kamala Harris is the best thing since sliced bread.
The obsession with Kamala has truly made her allies dumber than a bag of bricks, as they are just blinded and deluded into whatever their Democrat Party overlords tell them they are supposed to say and believe. For anyone who isn’t a rusted on Democrat Party shill, it’s all been quite maddening to watch.
Here’s a prime example of just how delusional the Democrat bootlickers have become. On a recent CNN segment, one of Kamala Harris’s allies tried to make the claim that Donald Trump is afraid to debate Kamala Harris because he already lost the debate against Joe Biden earlier this year. He claimed that Trump is “0 for 1” so far this year.
No, he actually said this. Here’s the proof below. We wouldn’t believe it unless we saw it either, it’s so delusional. Fair warning, you might lose some brain cells listening to this Democrat shill.
“Look, Trump right now is zero for one when it comes to debates, right? Like he may think that he won that debate, but it might be that he actually lost the war because of that debate,” Harris ally Jamal Simmons said with a straight face on the network. “Because after that debate, Joe Biden left. And when Joe Biden left, he ended up with Kamala Harris, so he should be careful.”
Scott Jennings couldn’t believe what he heard and had to ask Jamal Simmons what world he was living in because it isn’t the one in which the rest of us live in where Joe Biden stepped aside because of how badly he lost his debate against Donald Trump.
“Zero for one? Jamal, Jamal, my brother and colleague … He literally ran a man who’d been in politics for 52 years out of his chosen profession over a debate,” CNN’s Scott Jennings asked of Simmons.
“I mean, look, I understand what you’re arguing, that you all traded in for a better candidate, but Trump won the debate. He is not zero for one. Are you saying he actually did so well that he did badly?” he further asked of Simmons.
The funniest part about this whole exchange was watching Simmons simultaneously claim that Donald Trump ended up “losing” the debate against Joe Biden because he now has to face a more formidable candidate compared to Biden and claim that Kamala Harris will likely have a slow start in a debate against Donald Trump.
They are already making excuses for her having a bad performance, and yet they are claiming she’s the most powerful and intelligent candidate in American history. This is delusion of untold levels.
“Donald Trump may have tactically won the debate, but strategically, it may have cost him the entire election, because he ended up with a much better candidate than the one he was aiming for. And he’s probably now a couple of points behind,” Simmons went on to claim.
“Donald Trump has been in a couple of debates since then … She has not been in this debate format, so I think Democrats should give her a little bit of space to have maybe a slow start, give her a little bit of space to have some time to learn how to do the debate format again,” he went on to say, as if to prepare for excuses if she bombs the debate just like Joe Biden did.
Simmons concluded that he’s confident she’s going to do well against Donald Trump, but of course he has no evidence. And the evidence he does have, tells him as he admits that she could very well be in for a rough night since Donald Trump is used to these big Presidential debates and Kamala Harris is not.
This is a common theme of the Harris campaign so far. She has no good experience running a viable Presidential campaign, and it is truly showing so far. Her mainstream media crooks are just trying to play cover for her as long as they can to hide how incompetent she truly is.
You may remember that in 2019, she suspended her 2020 Presidential campaign before she even made it to the first primary election. She never earned a single delegate and, even though her campaign was met with immense fundraising, she had no real support and the bottom fell out from her campaign.
These are major similarities between her 2020 campaign and her 2024 campaign. In 2020, she was supposed to be a leading candidate and she had a ton of fundraising momentum, but it all meant nothing when it was go time for voters to actually support her. Will the same thing happen in 2024? Time will tell, but it wouldn’t be a surprise if she performs way worse than her corporate media polls are telling her right now.
Stay tuned to the DC Daily Journal.
